Skip to main content

Should the Conducter Drive the Train?

Trulia has an interesting feature called Trulia Voices. Real Estate professionals and consumers can pose questions to each other about nearly every aspect of buying and selling property. I've been following the Chicago-centric discussions for the last couple of months and I am enjoying alot of what I am reading. Buyers and Sellers ask for "free advice." Agents self-promote. "Expert" real estate investors pontificate. Good Stuff.

This site is not without its problems. As always, the relative anonymity of the internet affords people who do not really know the answers or even understand the questions opportunity to give answers with an appearance of authority. Hapless consumers are at risk of getting some really bad, even dangerous advice. Its caveat emptor for anyone who uses the web site that is supposed to help them navigate the wacky caveat emptor world of real estate deals.

I am seeing a lot of agents trying to answer legal questions. Some are from out of state and are absolutely clueless when it comes to local custom or practice. The locals? sadly, a mixed bag there too.

Relying on legal advice from an agent is a bit like asking the conductor to drive the train. Sure, she may know the route, and all the stops along the way, but that doesn't mean she knows how to work all the buttons or levers that the engineer engages to run the thing. (Then again, in the Jesse Fuller ditty, Monkey and the Engineer - everything works out pretty well in the end.)

By way of example, a Trulia member asked yesterday whether or not her father would be able to get out of a real estate contract on the premise that he thinks he might loose his job before the contract closes.

Can he get out? Maybe, but how can anyone say for certain? Well one plucky agent can. She boldly states:

"There is always a way to get the earnest money back. If you're using a standard real estate contract in Illinois, there are a few clauses in there. One, if the buyer can't obtain financing ( and your father seems to fall under that due to maybe losing his job, he can't get the loan), another is the home inspection, and there are more".
We were told by the questioner that her father had signed the contract more than two and one half weeks earlier. In all probability, he would be well beyond the typical periods allowed for attorney review and inspection contingencies. No mention of a mortgage financing contingency at all. Even if there was a contingency (that had not expired) would a lender refuse to lend based on the applicant's fear of losing his job?

I sent this agent a private email to follow and she again insisted that a buyer can always get out of a contract, at any time, for any reason. I meant to ask her if that is a guaranty she offers all of her clients. I mean, what is the point of signing a contract at all if it is never enforceable? Why would any of us bother?

Sure that advice might make the buyer and daughter feel better. Maybe the seller will show compassion and let them out of the contract. Maybe there still is a way out. But to blindly rely on that bad/wrong advice - a train wreck waiting to happen.
Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
Interesting post. Internet advice must always be taken with a "grain of salt".

If the choice is between "occasionally getting bad advice" and "squelching discussion"; I would always choose to deal with the occasional bad advice.

Your post offers consumers a reason to be careful however.
March 27, 2008 at 12:30 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PLM Title Shuttered

Title insurance is a critically important part of any real estate transaction; or at least it should be. The title company guaranties the "quality" of an owners interest in the property - that there aren't any (unknown) liens or defects. No buyer that I work for will purchase a property without it. Title insurance is only as good as the insurer. We want to know that the insurance company, like the Rock of Gibraltar , will always be there. We want to sleep easy at night, knowing that the client is protected. That said, it was a bit distressing to see that PLM Title Company shut its doors, without any forewarning last week. Worse still, this morning's news is that there is a criminal investigation underway - and that we do not yet know why. Old timers like me shudder with memories of the great Intercounty Title debacle five years ago. Here's to hoping that this one is nothing like that one. Set aside the problems involved trying to make a claim against a defun
6 comments
Read more

FHA Loans and Condo Sales - Is Relief on the Way?

By all outward appearances, state government in Illinois has ground to a complete halt, with all eyes focused on the Governor's "problem" and all the related fal - der -rah. Its hardly business as usual in Springfield, but not everything has ground to a halt. Several new bills have been introduced this week. That is not to say that they will be of benefit to we the people. Nonetheless, the cogs and gears are turning, and we are hoping for the best. One such proposal comes from Rep. LaShawn Ford of Chicago's west side, who is himself a real estate broker and entrepreneur . He is the author of House Bill 155 , introduced & referred to the Rules Committee Wednesday. It seeks to address one of the most common problems I am seeing in condominium resale transactions these days; the tension between many Declarations of Condominium and FHA loan guidelines. Many Condo Declarations provide Associations with a "right of first refusal," which basically allows t
3 comments
Read more

MAYOR DALEY PROPOSES TIF FINANCING FOR SOME DISTRESSED PROPERTIES

Lets see how City Council reacts on this one, but the Mayor introduced a pretty interesting little ordinance that might be a real boon to first time area home buyers willing to buy and rehabilitate some bank-owned properties. Progress Illinois reports that the mayor's bill, introduced on March 9: "seeks to tackle the growing problem of vacant homes that are blighting neighborhoods across Chicago, and in particular in minority communities. Called the Vacant Building TIF Purchase and Rehabilitation Ordinance, the  bill  (PDF) proposes allowing residents with a household income no greater than 100 percent of the regional median income to apply for a tax increment financing (TIF) grant that would pay for up to 25 percent of the cost of purchasing and rehabilitating an empty residential property. Single-family empty homes or units in condo and cooperative buildings with four units or fewer are eligible. The empty homes must be located in a TIF district and must be in need of
Post a Comment
Read more