Skip to main content

TAX RELIEF ON THE SALE OF (SOME) VACATION HOMES

A lot of attention these days is being focused on the struggles many, many people are enduring selling real estate at a loss, whether the result of mortgage woes or declining market prices, or both. Deservedly so. This is a big problem. This is reflected in a significant number of the contracts I am working on right now; short sales, properties in foreclosure; post-foreclosure bank sales; sellers paying money at closing to cover liabilities in order to sell. I am helping clients on all sides of these types of deals. Not a happy time at all for these sellers.

But still and all, many sellers are profiting handsomely when their deals close. And when they profit, the tax man takes interest. Fortunately, the Internal Revenue Code provides two very powerful protections for sellers. And now, as of March 10, there will be a significant expansion of one, to benefit some vacation property owners.

The Section 121, Principal Residence Exclusion, shelters up to $500,000 of capital gains on a Primary Residence, provided that certain guidelines are met.

Section 1031, delays capital gain liabilities on Investment Properties when taxpayers swap or exchange one investment property for another. Again, certain (strict) guidelines must be followed.

But what about vacation / second homes? Since they aren't principal residences, they don't qualify for section 121 treatment. But they aren't really "pure" investments either, or at least so sayeth the IRS. Revenue has historically opposed the use of 1031 exchanges, arguing that personal use and enjoyment negates the investment property requirements of section 1031.

The IRS position was most recently successful in a tax court case titled "Moore v. Commissioner." That decision however described several consideration that the Tax Court used to decide whether or not this is a qualifying investment property.

And, as a result, the IRS has actually spelled out the circumstances in which 1031 exchanges will work for some vacation home-owners; Revenue Procedure 2008-16.

The IRS now recognizes that even if you occasionally use your second home for personal use, you still might be able to utilize a 1031 swap when it is time to sell. To do so, you must be able to satisfy these "safe harbour" requirements:

Both the "old" and "new" properties must meet

  1. A Two Year "Ownership" test. (you have to own them for at least 24 months before the exchange); and
  2. A "Use" Test for both properties for two years. For each of the prior two 12-month periods, the properties must be either (i) rented out at fair market rates for 14 or more days and (ii) not used for personal use for more than either 14 days or 10% of the number of days that it was actually rented - whichever is greater. The same terms must apply for the new place too.
There are other considerations too, but this is a land mark change as it really opens up significant tax relief to anyone who wants to use the lakeside summer shack or ski town villa every once in a while.

Section 1031 exchanges are tricky matters. No one should try this alone. Seek out a reputable 1031 intermediary and get yourself competent legal and tax advice first.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PLM Title Shuttered

Title insurance is a critically important part of any real estate transaction; or at least it should be. The title company guaranties the "quality" of an owners interest in the property - that there aren't any (unknown) liens or defects. No buyer that I work for will purchase a property without it. Title insurance is only as good as the insurer. We want to know that the insurance company, like the Rock of Gibraltar , will always be there. We want to sleep easy at night, knowing that the client is protected. That said, it was a bit distressing to see that PLM Title Company shut its doors, without any forewarning last week. Worse still, this morning's news is that there is a criminal investigation underway - and that we do not yet know why. Old timers like me shudder with memories of the great Intercounty Title debacle five years ago. Here's to hoping that this one is nothing like that one. Set aside the problems involved trying to make a claim against a defun

FHA Loans and Condo Sales - Is Relief on the Way?

By all outward appearances, state government in Illinois has ground to a complete halt, with all eyes focused on the Governor's "problem" and all the related fal - der -rah. Its hardly business as usual in Springfield, but not everything has ground to a halt. Several new bills have been introduced this week. That is not to say that they will be of benefit to we the people. Nonetheless, the cogs and gears are turning, and we are hoping for the best. One such proposal comes from Rep. LaShawn Ford of Chicago's west side, who is himself a real estate broker and entrepreneur . He is the author of House Bill 155 , introduced & referred to the Rules Committee Wednesday. It seeks to address one of the most common problems I am seeing in condominium resale transactions these days; the tension between many Declarations of Condominium and FHA loan guidelines. Many Condo Declarations provide Associations with a "right of first refusal," which basically allows t

MAYOR DALEY PROPOSES TIF FINANCING FOR SOME DISTRESSED PROPERTIES

Lets see how City Council reacts on this one, but the Mayor introduced a pretty interesting little ordinance that might be a real boon to first time area home buyers willing to buy and rehabilitate some bank-owned properties. Progress Illinois reports that the mayor's bill, introduced on March 9: "seeks to tackle the growing problem of vacant homes that are blighting neighborhoods across Chicago, and in particular in minority communities. Called the Vacant Building TIF Purchase and Rehabilitation Ordinance, the  bill  (PDF) proposes allowing residents with a household income no greater than 100 percent of the regional median income to apply for a tax increment financing (TIF) grant that would pay for up to 25 percent of the cost of purchasing and rehabilitating an empty residential property. Single-family empty homes or units in condo and cooperative buildings with four units or fewer are eligible. The empty homes must be located in a TIF district and must be in need of