Skip to main content

CONDO LOAN GUIDELINES ARE CHANGING - AGAIN

Stop me if you have heard this one before.

FHA financing has become more prevalent in the market over the last two years as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac tightened the reigns on low down payment condo loans. More and more condo deals (at least the ones I am seeing) are being financed by FHA backed loans - they are still guaranteeing loans for up to 97% of a purchase price.

That may change soon in the wake of FHA's Mortgage Letter 09-19, issued earlier this week. Lending guidelines for condominiums are changing. again.

Basically, FHA requires that both the borrower and the property must satisfy lending guidelines. Condo approvals come in three different flavors:
  1. The Condominium is already on HUD's approved list;
  2. The developer or association apply for an approval of the entire building/project (to get on that list) - a "blanket" approval; or,
  3. The specific unit is approved on an ad hoc basis - a "spot" approval.
Spot approvals require certain specified requirements be met in order to obtain HUD’s blessing (Typically a two page questionnaire). A pain, but faster & easier than submitting the ream of documentations necessary for a blanket approval for an entire condo project.

HUD has announced that, effective October 1st, it is eliminating the spot approval process. Early reports suggest that some lenders stop processing applications for spot approvals even sooner (yikes!).

I strongly encourage anyone who is shopping for a condominium, and intends to use an FHA loan so as to make a minimal down payment, to get going NOW, before this rule changes. Blanket approvals might get somewhat streamlined, but are going to take time. Too much time to make them viable options for any single buyer or resale situation.

There are, at least, two silver linings in all of this

  • elimination FHA's prohibition of the right-of-first-refusals, and
  • and end to the "1-year waiting period" for condo conversion project approvals.

Comments

Kiwi said…
So does this mean condo associations who have a right of first refusal in their bylaws do not need to get them removed?
my favorite lawyer answer;

THAT DEPENDS!

1/ if the governor signs, and if FHA allows spot approvals on condos with the first right of refusal (FRR) then it would seem unnecessary to go through the hoops to eliminate them.

2/ if the unit owners do not have any urgent need or desire to sell their units in the near term, i'd be inclined to wait until after october 1 to see how mortgage lenders adapt to the new fha guidelines.

after the 1st, lenders with "direct endorsement" (DE) will be able to approve enitire condo buildings, for FHA. if they can do so efficiently (quickly) and without jacking up the costs of mortgage loans on those condos, there won't be any particular need to eliminate the FRR's. as a practical matter, it just wont matter any more.

3/ BUT, smaller condo associations (2-6 units?) might still want to give serious consideration to making the change. my suspicion is that DE approvals will make more business sense to lenders who believe that they will be able to make multiple loans into those buildings. the fewer the number or units, the fewer opportunities they will have to make loans, the less likely they will be to devote resources to approval of those condos.

smaller associations (in my mind, anyway) will probably still want to consider eliminating their frr's...particularly if an owner or two really want or need to sell soon.

Popular posts from this blog

PLM Title Shuttered

Title insurance is a critically important part of any real estate transaction; or at least it should be. The title company guaranties the "quality" of an owners interest in the property - that there aren't any (unknown) liens or defects. No buyer that I work for will purchase a property without it. Title insurance is only as good as the insurer. We want to know that the insurance company, like the Rock of Gibraltar , will always be there. We want to sleep easy at night, knowing that the client is protected. That said, it was a bit distressing to see that PLM Title Company shut its doors, without any forewarning last week. Worse still, this morning's news is that there is a criminal investigation underway - and that we do not yet know why. Old timers like me shudder with memories of the great Intercounty Title debacle five years ago. Here's to hoping that this one is nothing like that one. Set aside the problems involved trying to make a claim against a defun

FHA Loans and Condo Sales - Is Relief on the Way?

By all outward appearances, state government in Illinois has ground to a complete halt, with all eyes focused on the Governor's "problem" and all the related fal - der -rah. Its hardly business as usual in Springfield, but not everything has ground to a halt. Several new bills have been introduced this week. That is not to say that they will be of benefit to we the people. Nonetheless, the cogs and gears are turning, and we are hoping for the best. One such proposal comes from Rep. LaShawn Ford of Chicago's west side, who is himself a real estate broker and entrepreneur . He is the author of House Bill 155 , introduced & referred to the Rules Committee Wednesday. It seeks to address one of the most common problems I am seeing in condominium resale transactions these days; the tension between many Declarations of Condominium and FHA loan guidelines. Many Condo Declarations provide Associations with a "right of first refusal," which basically allows t

MAYOR DALEY PROPOSES TIF FINANCING FOR SOME DISTRESSED PROPERTIES

Lets see how City Council reacts on this one, but the Mayor introduced a pretty interesting little ordinance that might be a real boon to first time area home buyers willing to buy and rehabilitate some bank-owned properties. Progress Illinois reports that the mayor's bill, introduced on March 9: "seeks to tackle the growing problem of vacant homes that are blighting neighborhoods across Chicago, and in particular in minority communities. Called the Vacant Building TIF Purchase and Rehabilitation Ordinance, the  bill  (PDF) proposes allowing residents with a household income no greater than 100 percent of the regional median income to apply for a tax increment financing (TIF) grant that would pay for up to 25 percent of the cost of purchasing and rehabilitating an empty residential property. Single-family empty homes or units in condo and cooperative buildings with four units or fewer are eligible. The empty homes must be located in a TIF district and must be in need of