Skip to main content

NEGOTIATING A BETTER CONTRACT - SELLER CONSIDERATIONS part II

PART 2:
DON'T DELAY- Do The DUE DILIGENCE NOW

Current market conditions present two unfortunate realities for prospective home sellers: prices are declining. Market times are not. As a result, there are a lot of unsold homes languishing on the MLS and many, many more that are not currently active, but are available if there were Buyers willing to Buy. Worse still, merely accepting an offer does not assure an actual closing.
A great many contracts are falling apart before the closing. So why do so many Sellers shoot themselves in their collective feet by not being fully prepared to go forward on acceptable offers?

Sellers simply MUST do better. A great start is to compile the necessary due diligence materials when the property is first readied for market, well in advance of that acceptable offer.

Every seller of residential real estate in Illinois must make certain legal disclosures, to be given to prospective Buyers. For homes and condominiums that are considered "re-sales" these requirements include:
  1. a residential real property disclosure statement;
  2. a lead based paint disclosure statement;
  3. an information booklet about the dangers of lead poisoning;
  4. a radon disclosure statement
  5. an information booklet about the potential hazards of exposures to radon.
Chicago homeowners are also required to provide a heating cost disclosure.

Optionally, Chicago area homeowners may also be asked to provide mold hazard disclosures.

All Condominium owners and owners of properties located in planned developments or within homeowners associations must also produce association Declarations, By-Laws, financial statements, budgets and other related information. (as set out in the 'infamous' "rider 5") or in section 22.1 of the Illinois Condominium Property Act.

Failure to provide any of these documents or disclosures gives Buyers an easy way to back out of the deal, right up to the time of closing - and, in some situations, to even rescind a contract after it closes.

Why allow a buyer such an easy way out?. As an attorney representing Buyers, I typically see contracts well after they have been signed. One of the first things I do is request copies of all the applicable disclosures. Other competent lawyers do the same.

I am constantly amazed (but frankly, not at all surprised anymore) that it can take days to get Sellers to complete those disclosures. It can take weeks, sometimes a month or more, to collect the Condominium materials.

Its not like asking for them is going to come as a surprise to anyone in the business, and yet time and time again, Sellers and their listing agents fail to act proactively to have these things ready to go. The list has not changed in years.

Everyone knows the list. Everyone knows that the disclosures must be made... and that until the buyer sees ... and approves.... the disclosures, the Buyer can weasel out of the deal. So again, why would you let the buyer have free reign on this contingency?

Have everything ready to go, before the offer is received. Give it all to the Buyer the MOMENT her offer is accepted.

Start the clock as early as possible in order to close the contingency as early as possible. Get the deal closed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PLM Title Shuttered

Title insurance is a critically important part of any real estate transaction; or at least it should be. The title company guaranties the "quality" of an owners interest in the property - that there aren't any (unknown) liens or defects. No buyer that I work for will purchase a property without it. Title insurance is only as good as the insurer. We want to know that the insurance company, like the Rock of Gibraltar , will always be there. We want to sleep easy at night, knowing that the client is protected. That said, it was a bit distressing to see that PLM Title Company shut its doors, without any forewarning last week. Worse still, this morning's news is that there is a criminal investigation underway - and that we do not yet know why. Old timers like me shudder with memories of the great Intercounty Title debacle five years ago. Here's to hoping that this one is nothing like that one. Set aside the problems involved trying to make a claim against a defun

FHA Loans and Condo Sales - Is Relief on the Way?

By all outward appearances, state government in Illinois has ground to a complete halt, with all eyes focused on the Governor's "problem" and all the related fal - der -rah. Its hardly business as usual in Springfield, but not everything has ground to a halt. Several new bills have been introduced this week. That is not to say that they will be of benefit to we the people. Nonetheless, the cogs and gears are turning, and we are hoping for the best. One such proposal comes from Rep. LaShawn Ford of Chicago's west side, who is himself a real estate broker and entrepreneur . He is the author of House Bill 155 , introduced & referred to the Rules Committee Wednesday. It seeks to address one of the most common problems I am seeing in condominium resale transactions these days; the tension between many Declarations of Condominium and FHA loan guidelines. Many Condo Declarations provide Associations with a "right of first refusal," which basically allows t

MAYOR DALEY PROPOSES TIF FINANCING FOR SOME DISTRESSED PROPERTIES

Lets see how City Council reacts on this one, but the Mayor introduced a pretty interesting little ordinance that might be a real boon to first time area home buyers willing to buy and rehabilitate some bank-owned properties. Progress Illinois reports that the mayor's bill, introduced on March 9: "seeks to tackle the growing problem of vacant homes that are blighting neighborhoods across Chicago, and in particular in minority communities. Called the Vacant Building TIF Purchase and Rehabilitation Ordinance, the  bill  (PDF) proposes allowing residents with a household income no greater than 100 percent of the regional median income to apply for a tax increment financing (TIF) grant that would pay for up to 25 percent of the cost of purchasing and rehabilitating an empty residential property. Single-family empty homes or units in condo and cooperative buildings with four units or fewer are eligible. The empty homes must be located in a TIF district and must be in need of