Skip to main content

Let’s kick discrimination out of real estate

By Michael H. Wasserman

Discrimination is an ugly, pervasive problem. Even in real estate. We have come a long way over the course of American history, but we still have some work to do, especially in Chicago. As with any problem, this topic need needs to be examined, talked about and understood until we find effective solutions…and can provide equal access to home ownership for all.

Here are three examples of how discrimination still plagues the Chicagoland real estate scene. The first two may be a bit more well known, but third was a real eye-opener in our office. Quite surprising.

Chicago, we can do better when it comes to discrimination in real estate.
1. Minority owned properties are undervalued
No matter your heritage or zip code, your home is typically your largest financial asset and best potential wealth builder. Sadly, racism and bigotry have consistently blocked Black Americans from building wealth as properties in minority dominated areas are consistently undervalued compared to properties in other parts of the larger community. Brookings institute research suggests that, in Chicago property values of homes in majority Black neighborhoods are 28% lower. Nationwide, these racial biases have cost Black Americans more than $150 billion. Yes, billion.

2. Poor neighborhoods in Cook County are over-taxed
This one is a bit closer to home. A 2017, Chicago Tribune/Propublica investigation found that Cook County consistently assessed taxes for residential properties in poor and minority neighborhoods at rates far higher than their actual market values. Conversely, taxes for properties in affluent areas were assessed lower than their actual market values. This meant, come tax time, poor and minority homeowners typically paid more than their fair share; while the affluent paid less.

What can you do? We have long advocated that our clients contest their property assessments. And recommend that everyone do so at every opportunity.

3. Automated mortgage underwriting is biased against minority home-buyers
Right now, automated loan underwriting is the darling of the mortgage industry. Financial technology (FinTech) allows almost-instantaneous loan decisions that otherwise take up to 60 days to complete manually.

Not only is this supposed to be easier on consumers (and less labor intensive for lenders), one would think that taking the human element out of underwriting would rid the process of bias and discrimination. It turns out that one would be wrong.

This study from University of California, Berkeley, suggests that even online, mortgage lenders (unintentionally) stack the deck against Black and Latino homebuyers as software developers inadvertently built the same “logic” human loan officers use into their software.

As convenient as online applications and underwriting may be, not all lenders and not all loan programs are the same. Smart consumers comparison shop. Some programs price loans to minority borrowers higher because statistically, these buyers are less likely to shop for terms from other lenders.

How can we fight lender discrimination? Stay informed. Ask good questions. And, when it comes to getting a mortgage, always get at least one second opinion.

We work with some of the best mortgage professionals in all of Chicagoland, well suited to help all Chicagoans find the best loan products. Let us know if you’d like an introduction to any of them.

Learn more about valuation differences here:
The Devaluation of Assets in Black Neighborhoods from the Bookings Institute
Learn more about property tax disparities here:
Cook County Property Taxes Favor the Rich and White, Lawsuit Says by Courthouse News
Learn more about the problems with automated loan underwriting here:Are you a minority borrower? You may want to think twice about using an online lender By Tracy Jan

Comments

This comment has been removed by the author.
This comment has been removed by the author.

Popular posts from this blog

PLM Title Shuttered

Title insurance is a critically important part of any real estate transaction; or at least it should be. The title company guaranties the "quality" of an owners interest in the property - that there aren't any (unknown) liens or defects. No buyer that I work for will purchase a property without it. Title insurance is only as good as the insurer. We want to know that the insurance company, like the Rock of Gibraltar , will always be there. We want to sleep easy at night, knowing that the client is protected. That said, it was a bit distressing to see that PLM Title Company shut its doors, without any forewarning last week. Worse still, this morning's news is that there is a criminal investigation underway - and that we do not yet know why. Old timers like me shudder with memories of the great Intercounty Title debacle five years ago. Here's to hoping that this one is nothing like that one. Set aside the problems involved trying to make a claim against a defun

FHA Loans and Condo Sales - Is Relief on the Way?

By all outward appearances, state government in Illinois has ground to a complete halt, with all eyes focused on the Governor's "problem" and all the related fal - der -rah. Its hardly business as usual in Springfield, but not everything has ground to a halt. Several new bills have been introduced this week. That is not to say that they will be of benefit to we the people. Nonetheless, the cogs and gears are turning, and we are hoping for the best. One such proposal comes from Rep. LaShawn Ford of Chicago's west side, who is himself a real estate broker and entrepreneur . He is the author of House Bill 155 , introduced & referred to the Rules Committee Wednesday. It seeks to address one of the most common problems I am seeing in condominium resale transactions these days; the tension between many Declarations of Condominium and FHA loan guidelines. Many Condo Declarations provide Associations with a "right of first refusal," which basically allows t

MAYOR DALEY PROPOSES TIF FINANCING FOR SOME DISTRESSED PROPERTIES

Lets see how City Council reacts on this one, but the Mayor introduced a pretty interesting little ordinance that might be a real boon to first time area home buyers willing to buy and rehabilitate some bank-owned properties. Progress Illinois reports that the mayor's bill, introduced on March 9: "seeks to tackle the growing problem of vacant homes that are blighting neighborhoods across Chicago, and in particular in minority communities. Called the Vacant Building TIF Purchase and Rehabilitation Ordinance, the  bill  (PDF) proposes allowing residents with a household income no greater than 100 percent of the regional median income to apply for a tax increment financing (TIF) grant that would pay for up to 25 percent of the cost of purchasing and rehabilitating an empty residential property. Single-family empty homes or units in condo and cooperative buildings with four units or fewer are eligible. The empty homes must be located in a TIF district and must be in need of