Skip to main content

Should the Conducter Drive the Train?

Trulia has an interesting feature called Trulia Voices. Real Estate professionals and consumers can pose questions to each other about nearly every aspect of buying and selling property. I've been following the Chicago-centric discussions for the last couple of months and I am enjoying alot of what I am reading. Buyers and Sellers ask for "free advice." Agents self-promote. "Expert" real estate investors pontificate. Good Stuff.

This site is not without its problems. As always, the relative anonymity of the internet affords people who do not really know the answers or even understand the questions opportunity to give answers with an appearance of authority. Hapless consumers are at risk of getting some really bad, even dangerous advice. Its caveat emptor for anyone who uses the web site that is supposed to help them navigate the wacky caveat emptor world of real estate deals.

I am seeing a lot of agents trying to answer legal questions. Some are from out of state and are absolutely clueless when it comes to local custom or practice. The locals? sadly, a mixed bag there too.

Relying on legal advice from an agent is a bit like asking the conductor to drive the train. Sure, she may know the route, and all the stops along the way, but that doesn't mean she knows how to work all the buttons or levers that the engineer engages to run the thing. (Then again, in the Jesse Fuller ditty, Monkey and the Engineer - everything works out pretty well in the end.)

By way of example, a Trulia member asked yesterday whether or not her father would be able to get out of a real estate contract on the premise that he thinks he might loose his job before the contract closes.

Can he get out? Maybe, but how can anyone say for certain? Well one plucky agent can. She boldly states:

"There is always a way to get the earnest money back. If you're using a standard real estate contract in Illinois, there are a few clauses in there. One, if the buyer can't obtain financing ( and your father seems to fall under that due to maybe losing his job, he can't get the loan), another is the home inspection, and there are more".
We were told by the questioner that her father had signed the contract more than two and one half weeks earlier. In all probability, he would be well beyond the typical periods allowed for attorney review and inspection contingencies. No mention of a mortgage financing contingency at all. Even if there was a contingency (that had not expired) would a lender refuse to lend based on the applicant's fear of losing his job?

I sent this agent a private email to follow and she again insisted that a buyer can always get out of a contract, at any time, for any reason. I meant to ask her if that is a guaranty she offers all of her clients. I mean, what is the point of signing a contract at all if it is never enforceable? Why would any of us bother?

Sure that advice might make the buyer and daughter feel better. Maybe the seller will show compassion and let them out of the contract. Maybe there still is a way out. But to blindly rely on that bad/wrong advice - a train wreck waiting to happen.


Gabe Sumner said…
Interesting post. Internet advice must always be taken with a "grain of salt".

If the choice is between "occasionally getting bad advice" and "squelching discussion"; I would always choose to deal with the occasional bad advice.

Your post offers consumers a reason to be careful however.

Popular posts from this blog

Do I HAVE to shovel? Chicago snow shoveling law and etiquette

Set aside any discussion of climate change for a moment. It’s winter. It’s Chicago. It snows. As a homeowner, you owe it to your friends, family, neighbors and delivery people to keep the sidewalks free of snow and ice.

The Equifax data breach and you — 6 steps to take now

Identity thieves hit a major credit reporting agency—hard. Millions of consumers’ confidential identity information has been compromised.

Equifax, one of the big three credit reporting agencies announced that a massive security breach took place earlier this year. Offenders accessed data sets of 143 million US consumers.

With federal tax reform looming, should I prepay 2017 Cook County property taxes?

By Michael H. Wasserman

Paying property tax bills before the end of the 2017 may help some owners save on their federal income tax liabilities.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act has been called the most sweeping tax reform bill in decades. Like it or
not, tax reform is coming. Others might wring their hands with glee or with worry. We are already working on ways to minimize the pain this reform might cause. 
One aspect of the pending tax reform plan presents a clear challenge for most Chicagoland home owners, the elimination of deductions for State and Local Taxes (SALT). The house and senate plans both limit deductibility to $10,000. Once the tax reform is signed into law, we will pay federal income taxes on the money we use to pay our local taxes exceeding that $10,000 threshold. Some homeowners who have the foresight (and lets face it, the savings) to act swiftly may want to pre-pay their first installment 2017 property tax bills this year before the tax laws kick in, so that those payments …