Skip to main content

UNSAFE: UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF SAFE MORTGAGE LICENSING ACT OF 2008 MAKE IT HARDER FOR SOME LOCAL BUYERS TO FINANCE THEIR HOME PURCHASES

Local buyers hoping to finance their home purchases with a loan from a parent or other family member are going to need to change their plans. Quickly. Sellers offering financing to prospective buyers too.  As of January 1st, 2011, ONLY Illinois mortgage licensees, regulated/licensed banks, savings & loans, credit unions, insurance companies, and the like can make residential mortgages for gain or profit..

Non-interest bearing mortgage loans are still allowed.

The new rule was enacted to implement a Federal law intended to enhance consumer protection and reduce fraud in the mortgage industry. That protection it seems, comes at a cost. Consumers have no choice now. Licensed mortgage lenders are the only game in town. At least for residential transaction.

THE FEDERAL LAW:
The Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 (“SAFE Act”), was passed on July 30, 2008.  The federal obligated each of the 50 states to enact their own laws requiring licensure of mortgage loan originators (lenders) according to national standards and to participate in the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry (NMLS).  The Act sets minimum standards for licensing and registration of state-licensed mortgage loans.  The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is charged by the SAFE Act with establishing and implementing a system for mortgage loan originators in States that do not meet the minimum requirements

State-licensed loan originators must  
complete pre-licensure training,
pass written tests,
take annual continuing education courses,
be fingerprinted,
submitted to a national registry and to the FBI for a criminal background check;
provide authorization to the registry to obtain an independent credit reports, or provide appropriate surety bonds.

The SAFE Act required the states to have a licensing and registration system in place by either July 31, 2009 (for states whose legislatures meet annually) or July 31, 2010 (for states whose legislatures meet biennially). The federal registry itself just opened on January 31, 2011.

THE PROBLEMATIC FEDERAL PROVISION:

This law applies to  any individual who, for compensation or gain, takes a residential
mortgage loan application or offers or negotiates terms of a residential mortgage loan application. There are no apparent exceptions. This means that anyone who expects to collect interest on a mortgage loan, including say,  sellers wishing to give a buyer financing or parents intending to help a child out, are deemed to be receiving compensation or gain in the process. They must take the classes, tests and otherwise enter the federal registry.

THE PROBLEMATIC STATE PROVISION:

Although Illinois law exempts individual who offer loans with immediate family members and who offer loans secured by their own residences from registration as loan originators, the Illinois Residential Mortgage License Act prohibits the funding, originating and servicing of residential mortgage loans without a license.

HELP ON THE WAY:

Last week, Senator Michael Frerichs introduced SB1603, seeking to exempt anyone who makes three or fewer residential mortgage loans a year from licensure. If and when this bill is enacted into law, seller financing, and intra-family secured mortgage lending may resume.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FHA Loans and Condo Sales - Is Relief on the Way?

By all outward appearances, state government in Illinois has ground to a complete halt, with all eyes focused on the Governor's "problem" and all the related fal - der -rah. Its hardly business as usual in Springfield, but not everything has ground to a halt. Several new bills have been introduced this week. That is not to say that they will be of benefit to we the people. Nonetheless, the cogs and gears are turning, and we are hoping for the best. One such proposal comes from Rep. LaShawn Ford of Chicago's west side, who is himself a real estate broker and entrepreneur . He is the author of House Bill 155 , introduced & referred to the Rules Committee Wednesday. It seeks to address one of the most common problems I am seeing in condominium resale transactions these days; the tension between many Declarations of Condominium and FHA loan guidelines. Many Condo Declarations provide Associations with a "right of first refusal," which basically allows t

So.... about the blawg

Nov. 2022 Hello Dear Reader. I started blogging on this site 15 years ago.  Crazy right? May or may not Chicago's longest-running blog about real estate law. I think so, but who knows, Whether it is or isn't doesn't, of course, really matter.   Either way, it's been a blast.  But things change. We've pulled up the tent stakes here and are relocated on other platforms. Want to follow along? Join us on the mothership I'm also writing on LinkedIn Thanks for everything.

PLM Title Shuttered

Title insurance is a critically important part of any real estate transaction; or at least it should be. The title company guaranties the "quality" of an owners interest in the property - that there aren't any (unknown) liens or defects. No buyer that I work for will purchase a property without it. Title insurance is only as good as the insurer. We want to know that the insurance company, like the Rock of Gibraltar , will always be there. We want to sleep easy at night, knowing that the client is protected. That said, it was a bit distressing to see that PLM Title Company shut its doors, without any forewarning last week. Worse still, this morning's news is that there is a criminal investigation underway - and that we do not yet know why. Old timers like me shudder with memories of the great Intercounty Title debacle five years ago. Here's to hoping that this one is nothing like that one. Set aside the problems involved trying to make a claim against a defun