Skip to main content

FOE FOILS FOSSIL-HUNTER'S FLOAT TRIPS

 

Court Clobbers Kayaker. Concludes Competitor's Contiguous Keep Cannot be Crossed

by Michael H. Wasserman

The sun sets majestically. You take another sip of lemonade. Your attention focuses on the gentle wind blowing thru the trees. The noise of water coursing along river at the far end of the property. The blissful payoff for a long long week at work. The calm evaporates when you open the letter – a cease and desist order from a neighbor’s lawyer. You are directed to stay off their property. This puzzles you. You’ve been here three months and never once set foot on their land, barely even know which place is theirs. You haven’t been to any neighbors yet. Just the new place and the river. And this, my friend was your downfall. The neighbor does not want you to boat past his place.

Turns out, owning riverfront property does not necessarily confer access right upstream or down. The neighbors might have a thing or two to say about it too. In these circumstances, absent permission, taking your new paddle boat downstream into town might be a trespass.

Adam Holm learned this lesson the hard way, in a decision handed down by the Illinois Appellate Court last month.

WHAT HAPPENED?

 The Mazon River is known for large deposits of fossils thought to be more than 300 million years old. They have attracted much attention in fossil hunting circles for going back to the civil war era. The Holms own two pieces of property along the Mazon in Grundy County. One landlocked, that is, there is no road access to it and one with road access. The Holms engaged in a fossil hunting business using both of parcels of land. They would drop kayaks in the river from their road-accessible lot, paddle down to the inaccessible lot and then exit further along at the Pine Bluff Road Bridge. Peter Kodat, who also runs a fossil hunting business owns another piece of property on the Mazon somewhere along this portion of the river. He organized a couple of other neighbors to join him and sign written trespass notices prohibiting the Holms from kayaking on their portions of the river. At one point Kodat went so far as to have the Grundy County Sheriffs arrest Holms for trespass. Holms sued them all for the right to access the whole river, free of trespass. Both the trial court and the appellate court ruled against him. Their kayaking actions were indeed trespasses.

SO, SO, HOW DOES SOMEONE OWNS A RIVER (OR THE RIGHT TO USE IT)?

Generally, ownership and usage of bodies of water fall into the realm of Riparian Rights. Riparian rights extend to all water-ways, rivers, lakes and oceans. The underlying principals are found in common law created long ago. Many of the cases relied on for precent are from at best the earliest decades of the 20th century. Notably, this decision is said to be the first riparian rights opinion this century.

In Illinois, the general rule is that an owners access to land bounded by a stream extends to the mid-point of the riverbed and along the entire shoreline of their property. The public however is given a navigation easement in waters which are navigable in fact.

A river or stream is navigable in fact if is “of sufficient depth to afford a channel for use for commerce” by customary modes of transportation. A river is not navigable even if that streams is large enough for rowboats or small launches!

All parties to the case agreed that Mazon River is non-navigable. Accordingly, there is no public easement for passage. Kodat and the other neighbors each owned to the mid-point of the river and each could individually or collectively bar the Holms from using their parts of the river.

FINAL THOUGHTS:

Riparian rights are usually come into play more in agricultural and industrial contexts relating to the use or diversion of water. But, as more and more of us – and our clients – become interested in the recreational use of waterways and rural living, these issues will come up more and more frequently.

Anyone thinking of buying land that has a water feature – and the brokers helping identify possible parcels should be aware of this case. Not all waterways include access. Not all owners get access to the entire waterway.

Understanding whether a river or stream is navigable or not might save you – or your client – from the ruin of a perfectly good lemonade or sunset.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PLM Title Shuttered

Title insurance is a critically important part of any real estate transaction; or at least it should be. The title company guaranties the "quality" of an owners interest in the property - that there aren't any (unknown) liens or defects. No buyer that I work for will purchase a property without it. Title insurance is only as good as the insurer. We want to know that the insurance company, like the Rock of Gibraltar , will always be there. We want to sleep easy at night, knowing that the client is protected. That said, it was a bit distressing to see that PLM Title Company shut its doors, without any forewarning last week. Worse still, this morning's news is that there is a criminal investigation underway - and that we do not yet know why. Old timers like me shudder with memories of the great Intercounty Title debacle five years ago. Here's to hoping that this one is nothing like that one. Set aside the problems involved trying to make a claim against a defun...
6 comments
Read more

FHA Loans and Condo Sales - Is Relief on the Way?

By all outward appearances, state government in Illinois has ground to a complete halt, with all eyes focused on the Governor's "problem" and all the related fal - der -rah. Its hardly business as usual in Springfield, but not everything has ground to a halt. Several new bills have been introduced this week. That is not to say that they will be of benefit to we the people. Nonetheless, the cogs and gears are turning, and we are hoping for the best. One such proposal comes from Rep. LaShawn Ford of Chicago's west side, who is himself a real estate broker and entrepreneur . He is the author of House Bill 155 , introduced & referred to the Rules Committee Wednesday. It seeks to address one of the most common problems I am seeing in condominium resale transactions these days; the tension between many Declarations of Condominium and FHA loan guidelines. Many Condo Declarations provide Associations with a "right of first refusal," which basically allows t...
3 comments
Read more

MAYOR DALEY PROPOSES TIF FINANCING FOR SOME DISTRESSED PROPERTIES

Lets see how City Council reacts on this one, but the Mayor introduced a pretty interesting little ordinance that might be a real boon to first time area home buyers willing to buy and rehabilitate some bank-owned properties. Progress Illinois reports that the mayor's bill, introduced on March 9: "seeks to tackle the growing problem of vacant homes that are blighting neighborhoods across Chicago, and in particular in minority communities. Called the Vacant Building TIF Purchase and Rehabilitation Ordinance, the  bill  (PDF) proposes allowing residents with a household income no greater than 100 percent of the regional median income to apply for a tax increment financing (TIF) grant that would pay for up to 25 percent of the cost of purchasing and rehabilitating an empty residential property. Single-family empty homes or units in condo and cooperative buildings with four units or fewer are eligible. The empty homes must be located in a TIF district and must be in need of...
Post a Comment
Read more